The DWP have estimated between 310,000 and 500,000 disabled people will
lose all support following the reforms to Disability Living Allowance, which will only affect working-age
disabled people, including the 2,010,000 who currently claim DLA.
These are not (all) fraudulent claimants – at least 209,500 non-fraudulent DLA claimants will lose out - assuming every one of the fraudulent claimants is weeded out during the reassessment process. (The DWP estimates that 0.5% of DLA claimants are fraudulent. 2,010,000 x 0.5% = 100,500. 310,000 – 100,500 = 209,500. The higher figure is 500,000 - 100,500 = 400,500 disabled people losing benefit support)
These are not (all) fraudulent claimants – at least 209,500 non-fraudulent DLA claimants will lose out - assuming every one of the fraudulent claimants is weeded out during the reassessment process. (The DWP estimates that 0.5% of DLA claimants are fraudulent. 2,010,000 x 0.5% = 100,500. 310,000 – 100,500 = 209,500. The higher figure is 500,000 - 100,500 = 400,500 disabled people losing benefit support)
I’ve spent Sunday afternoon using DWP reported figures to
work out:
a) the current numbers of working-age disabled people
getting each combination of DLA rates
b) what the new PIP regime will look like in terms of
different types of claimant
c) from that, where the cuts will come from to reduce the
numbers of claimants by 310,000
Total DLA expenditure currently £12,000,000,000 (From http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/adhoc_analysis/2011/analysis_of_disability_living_allowance_DLA_awards.pdf )
Total number of claimants = 3,203,000
Number of working age claimants = 2,010,000
Number of claimants under 16 = 335,000
Number of pensioners = 857,000
(claimant numbers from http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/eia-dla-reform-wr2011.pdf )
Percent of claimants that are working age = 2,010,000 /
3,203,000
= 62.7%
I will round to 63%
63% of current budget £12,000,000,000 x 0.63
= £7,560,000,000£7,560,000,000 / 2,010,000 = £3,779
Average of total budget
spend per claimant = £3,779
PIP will have 20% decrease in total budget = £9,600,000,000
PIP is only for working age claimants. Pension age claimants
will continue to get DLA, and not be reassessed for PIP.
Only working age claimants affected by change to PIP. So
100-63% = 37% of CURRENT budget must go to claimants not of working age (children and pensioners). = £4,440,000,000
Amount left for working age claimants will be
£9,600,000,000 – 4,440000,000 = £5,160,000,000
£5,160,000,000 / 2,000,500
= £2,579 per head
So if the total
number of DLA claimants simply transfers to PIP, each claimant will, on
average, lose £1,200 a year, or £100 a month.
However, the DWP itself accepts that will not happen - people will lose their benefit support.
However, the DWP itself accepts that will not happen - people will lose their benefit support.
The information below uses the DWP figures from “Disability
Living Allowance Reform, Equality Impact Assessment. May 2012” http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/eia-dla-reform-wr2011.pdf Table 8, Page 12 for proportions of each
claim rate.
Who currently gets
DLA and at what rates?
These are the current numbers of people getting each combination
of DLA rates.
Lower Rate Care
|
Middle Rate Care
|
Higher Rate Care
|
Care – no award
|
|
Lower Rate Mobility
|
LRM & LRC
|
LRM & MRC
|
LRM & HRC
|
LRM
|
190950
|
347730
|
122610
|
80400
|
|
9.50%
|
17.30%
|
6.10%
|
4.00%
|
|
Higher Rate Mobility
|
HRM & LRC
|
MRC & HRM
|
HRC & HRM
|
HRM
|
271350
|
271350
|
299490
|
184920
|
|
13.50%
|
13.50%
|
14.90%
|
9.20%
|
|
Mobility – No Award
|
LRC
|
MRC
|
HRC
|
XX
|
188940
|
42210
|
8040
|
0
|
|
9.40%
|
2.10%
|
0.40%
|
0%
|
Table 1 – percentage
of working age claimants getting each combination of DLA rate and number of
claimants at each rate.
Figure in middle cells indicates number of claimants,
calculated using total number of working age claimants = 2,010,000, and
percentage provided in table 8 of referenced document. Some rounding has
clearly been used in the DLA Table 8 as the percentages do not add to 100%, and
total claimants is 2,007,990.
This is my estimate of how PIP will look – based on some
assumptions described beneath the table.
.
Care – standard rate
|
Care – enhanced rate
|
Care – no award
|
|
Mobility – standard rate
|
C-SR & M-SR
12%
|
C-ER & M-SR
15%
|
M-SR
6%
|
Mobility – enhanced rate
|
C-SR & M-ER
12%
|
C-ER & M-ER
23%
|
M-ER
15%
|
Mobility – no award
|
C-SR
14%
|
C-ER
3%
|
XX
|
Table 2 – estimated
proportions of PIP claimants by rate, projected from DLA proportions.
Note. I have estimated the proportions of people receiving
PIP based on the following assumptions and evidence:
The reforms claim to be helping those in greatest need – so
I’ve increased the proportion getting enhanced rate benefits slightly, and assumed some lower rate claimants will lose out. Also, people who can "mobilise" effectively may be considered not in need of mobility support. "mobilise" includes using a wheelchair.
There are fewer rates to choose from, so I’ve combined DLA
claim proportions to map across to PIP (e.g. MRC & HRC have combined to
C-ER)
Total projected number of PIP claimants in the DWPs analysis
is 1,700,0002
C-SR
|
C-ER
|
C-None
|
|
M-SR
|
204000
|
255000
|
102000
|
M-ER
|
204000
|
425000
|
255000
|
M-none
|
238000
|
51000
|
XX
|
Table 4 – estimated
number of PIP claimants by rate, calculated from reference 2 figure of
projected PIP numbers 2015 = 1,700,000.
C-SR
|
C-ER
|
C-None
|
|
M-SR
|
204,000
DWP – 250,00
|
255,000
DWP -110,000
|
102,000
DWP-230,000
|
M-ER
|
204,000
DWP-190,000
|
425000
DWP -340,000
|
255,000
DWP -230,00
|
M-none
|
238,000
DWP-250,000
|
51,000
DWP- 90,000
|
XX
|
Table 5 amended–
estimated number of PIP claimants by rate with DWP projected figures added. (With thanks to @Narco_sam for finding the figures in http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/pip-assessment-thresholds-and-consultation.pdf )
Many additional types of support are “passported” from
DLA.
Not all DLA claimants will be able to access all of these things - they are dependent on DLA rate awarded, economic need, area of the country the claimant lives in, amongst other things.
Not all DLA claimants will be able to access all of these things - they are dependent on DLA rate awarded, economic need, area of the country the claimant lives in, amongst other things.
* Enhanced Housing Benefit rates to account for need for extra room for carers or equipment
* Someone getting Carer's Allowance for looking after someone on DLA will lose that Carer's Allowance
* Concessionary travel schemes - Freedom Pass, local bus passes and the National Rail Disabled Person’s Railcard, M6 toll pass, London Congestion Zone exemption
* Concessionary travel schemes - Freedom Pass, local bus passes and the National Rail Disabled Person’s Railcard, M6 toll pass, London Congestion Zone exemption
* Motability funding so disabled people can afford adapted
cars.
* Blue Badges for disabled parking
* Access to some local council support
* Discounted access to gyms and leisure centres
* discounted or free tickets at some galleries, museums, cinemas and theatres for
your carer, so you don’t have to pay extra to go out, just because you can’t go
alone.
* Higher rate mobility DLA claimants can learn to drive at 17, and get free car tax.
* Warm Home rebate from some energy suppliers.
* Enhanced Income Support levels to account for increased costs of life with impairment
* Higher rate mobility DLA claimants can learn to drive at 17, and get free car tax.
* Warm Home rebate from some energy suppliers.
* Enhanced Income Support levels to account for increased costs of life with impairment
Fraud figure from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmworpen/1493/1493vw43.htm
Edit: Oh, and best estimate of fraudulent claimants is 0.5%, or 1 claimant in 200.
4 comments:
I think this is a useful exercise, but with a built-in problem, the Tories. Or more precisely, the attitudes we see going into the revised PIP criteria, which are likely going to produce some weirdly localized effects.
We can assume a bottom-slicing effect, where those in the lower rate groups are targeted as easier targets politically, but people on lower rates are eligible for a smaller slice of the budget pro-rata, which will mean the cuts will have to be spread over a larger number of people to have equivalent effect.
But moving out of the lower rate groups we have the absurdity where someone using a wheelchair may potentially be assumed to have no mobility issues, and my brain is in too much of a fuzz today to remember whether or not PIP's planned descriptors still include the ultimate absurdity of the phantom wheelchair (where you can be assessed as a wheelchair user whether or not you possess or could afford an appropriate chair), which is going to mean some targeted cuts in the HRM group, rather than the simple increase you've assumed.
I think what's needed is a similar process to the one you've gone through, but rather than assuming an average award for DLA, multiply the population of each group by the actual rate of the awards to give you a percentage break down by share of the existing DLA budget, then apply your migration to PIP process and see how that works out against the available budget.
Our local council seems likely to target Council tax support on people in receipt of PIP; disabled people NOT in receipt of PIP seem likely to be deemed non-vulnerable and will take a lot (tho not all) of the council shortfall in funding for council tax support.
Peta
Reply to Anonymous 08/10/12, 02:49
Indeed. Many councils and other organisations use receipt of DLA (or soon, PIP) as the only acceptance that someone is disabled.
Never mind that some 1/6 people in the UK have an impairment or long term health condition that means they are, effectively, disabled. Oh no, you're only disabled if you get one of the hardest benefits to qualify for.
It's disgusting, and very much not in the spirit of the Equality Act, or the Social Model of Disability.
@DavidG: They have promised "no imaginary wheelchair test"; the 2nd draft criteria also have the need for a wheelchair (as long as you can't get 50m without it, reliably, repeatedly, etc) as an automatic Enhanced rate Mobility thing.
We still don't have a third draft of assessment criteria, or information on the rates that will be paid.
Post a Comment